07 maart 2007

education here and there -- reflection3

There are benefits to both educational systems; however, the Dutch educational system appears to be more efficient. The American educational system puts too strong of an emphasis on theory; practice is often disregarded. However, it is crucial to put such an emphasis on theory so as not to lose indispensable knowledge. Skill is developed through practice, but why practice something you do not understand? I believe the Dutch educational system is a bit more mature in the sense that it focuses on preparing students for the vocational world at an early stage in life. They chose a "major", so to speak, already in their second year of high school, which in my opinion is a bit to early to decide on a vocation; however, it could be seen as highly beneficial because focusing your study allows you to be very familiar (professional) with the field you chose to study. Though, liberal arts allows for a broader education and a more open understanding of the connections and relationships among various fields of study, which can also be seen as highly beneficial. It really depends on the way you look at things. I have a hard time with the segregation of students based on their "level" of intellect. I understand the idea behind it; however, weaker students, I feel, are challenged to become stronger when they have smarter students working beside them. "you're only as strong as your weakest link"--build 'em up!
plus, we do have the AP opportunity and standardized tests are given and if you are recognized as an intelligent student, there are many opportunities for you to take advanced classes and recieve college funding. oye... i could write for hours on this ONE topic, but i will leave it at that before my fingers get numb from writing so much.

Geen opmerkingen: